Continuous Improvement 
    
   
 
 Checklists
      Checklists are good indicators of "can do–can't do" and "done–not done," but are less informative than scaled rubrics. In general, checklists are not used to indicate the relative quality of a product or performance. Checklists are used for the following:
To record observed performance. 
        While students work in small 
          groups, you might note whether or not individuals demonstrate 
          ability or knowledge in some predetermined categories aligned 
          to course content and objectives. For example, in a unit on leisure-time 
          activities for Novice-level learners, a simple checklist might 
          look like this: 
| Activities Checklist | ||
| Yes | No | Can name five sports | 
| Yes | No | Can name five activities other than sports | 
| Yes | No | Can create simple sentences about likes & dislikes regarding activities & sports | 
| Yes | No | Can ask a question about what others do in their free time | 
        For self-assessment. 
        Students can use the above checklist to 
        evaluate their own progress. The statements would be changed to 
        "can do" statements of the type: "I can name five 
        sports in German."
        To keep track of progress over time.
      For example, a checklist could be used as an inventory of 
        skills at the beginning and end of a course. This type of checklist 
        might form part of a portfolio. 
| Receptive oral skills | 
|  Understands 
          simple directions. | 
|  Understands 
          simple sentences. | 
|  Understands 
        simple yes/no questions. | 
|  Understands 
        vocabulary appropriate to age. | 
|  Understands 
        meaning of different intonation patterns. | 
|  Understands 
        more complex directions. | 
|  Understands 
        rapid speech. | 
|  Understands 
        language in classroom situation. | 
|  Understands 
        language of peers. | 
Adapted from Genesee, F. & Upshur, J.A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second-language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 88.
        To specify the non-negotiables.
      The 
      non-negotiables 
        (D. Clementi, personal communication, October 2002) are items or aspects which 
        will not be included in your qualitative criteria. For example, 
        if a report is to be typed rather than handwritten, include this 
        requirement on the checklist. Handwritten submissions do not meet 
        your minimal requirements for a report, so the product is not 
        ready to be evaluated. Giving the checklist to students at the beginning of a project allows them to be aware of, and responsible for, the non-negotiables. 
        The example below is intended for self-assessment by students 
      who wrote an essay about a story they read:
| Essay - Non-negotiables | ||
| Yes | No | My paper is typed, double-spaced. | 
| Yes | No | I wrote at least 500 words. | 
| Yes | No | My paper has an introduction, body, and conclusion. | 
| Yes | No | I included examples from the story. | 
| Yes | No | I proofread my paper. | 
        To help students fulfill task requirements. Giving learners 
        a checklist of the steps to complete within a task can help them 
        turn in a better performance. The example below illustrates a 
        checklist that might be used with one draft of an essay in a multi-draft 
        approach. This checklist focused on grammatical elements serves 
        to: 1) allow the teacher to indicate to students where they need 
        to direct attention at this point in the essay-writing process, 
        and 2) remind students of what they are expected to verify before 
        turning in their second draft. It would be difficult to give meaningful 
        feedback about the content of the essay in a checklist, and it 
        is assumed that students have other opportunities to receive comments 
        from their teacher and/or peers. 
| Essay - Proofreading check - Draft 2 | ||
|  |  | Length requirement | 
|  |  | Spell-checked | 
|  |  | Subject-verb agreement | 
|  |  | Noun-adjective agreement | 
|  |  | Verb conjugations | 
Advantages of Checklists
- Easy to construct and use.
- Align closely with tasks.
- Effective for self and peer assessment.
- Make learners aware of task requirements, allowing them to self-monitor progress.
- Useful for sharing information with parents and other stakeholders.
      Disadvantages of Checklists
      - Provide limited information about how to improve performance.
- Do not indicate relative quality of performance.
(Brindley, 1989; Genesee & Upshur, 1996; Tedick, 2002; Underhill, 1987)






