|
|
Reprimands & Responses to Reprimands |
- Overall, when reprimanding, the boss tended to exhibit authority and assert the position of power. This is often done by threatening the employee's freedom of action as well as the solidarity of the relationship.
- In Venezuelan Spanish, reprimands tended to be more verbose than reprimands in Peruvian Spanish, and used mitigators to soften the reprimand. The Peruvian Spanish group preferred aggravators to increase the intensity of the reprimand (more assertion of power).
- In Venezuelan Spanish, there are three clear stages of a reprimand: (1) present the reprimand, (2) respond to the interaction, and (3) conclude the interaction.
- In Peruvian Spanish, there are three components of a reprimand: (1) reprimand, (2) justification, and (3) response to the justification. These do not necessarily have to occur in order.
- When responding to reprimands, all three groups used a variety of different strategies, but tended to recognize the authority of the boss.
- In Peruvian Spanish, the responses tended to be less aggressive and demonstrated a preference for the authoritative position of the boss. Males and females differed in that males tended to view the reprimand as a "challenge" and respond in a more confrontational nature than females. The females balanced the confrontation with admission of responsibility.
- Venezuelan responses to reprimands tended to be more verbose and demonstrated a preference for direct response strategies. Overall, the group was more aggressive and tended to prefer self-defense.
- The Argentinean group approached the response in a cooperative manner and participants preferred to threaten their own image as opposed to that of the boss.
|
|
|
|